'How much does it cost to add AI to our product?' is the question we get most, and the honest answer — 'it depends' — is useless. So here's the version with actual numbers: where AI money goes in 2026, what the token bills really look like, and how to keep them from quietly ballooning. Prices move fast, so treat every figure below as an order of magnitude, not a quote.
TL;DR
For most small-to-mid AI features, the model tokens are not your biggest cost — engineering, data plumbing and the 'boring' reliability work are. A well-built AI feature usually runs from a few thousand to a few tens of thousands of rupees a month in model spend. The six-figure horror stories almost always come from a handful of avoidable leaks, not from the base price of intelligence.
The four buckets of AI cost
- Model / inference — what you pay per token to the provider (or per hour to host your own). The part everyone fixates on; often not the biggest.
- Build — engineering time to design, integrate, add retrieval, guardrails, evals and observability. Usually the largest line item in year one.
- Data & infra — vector database, storage, embeddings, pipelines, logging. Small per unit, but constant.
- Operate — monitoring, prompt and version maintenance, re-evaluating on model updates, human-in-the-loop review. The cost people forget to budget.
Build (eng time) ████████████████████████ ~55% Model / inference ██████████ ~20% Operate / maintain ███████ ~15% Data & infra ████ ~10% ───────────────────────────────────────────────────── The token bill is the part you watch; the eng time is the part that actually costs you.
Token pricing, in plain terms
Providers charge per million tokens (roughly 750,000 words), and separately for input vs. output. Two things matter more than the exact rate:
- Frontier vs. small models differ ~10–30× in price. The biggest, smartest model can cost tens of dollars per million tokens; a small fast one can cost cents. Most tasks don't need the frontier.
- Output is pricier than input, often several times over. Long, chatty responses cost more than they look.
- Prices keep falling. The rate you pay today for a given capability is almost always cheaper than a year ago. Architect assuming it drops further.
Rule of thumb
Route the easy 80% of requests to a cheap, fast model and reserve the expensive frontier model for the genuinely hard 20%. This single decision often cuts a model bill by more than half with no visible drop in quality.
A real monthly bill for a small AI feature
Take a support assistant handling around 30,000 messages a month, with retrieval over your docs. A rough, honest breakdown:
- 1Model tokens — with mixed cheap/frontier routing, often ~₹8,000–₹25,000/month at this volume
- 2Vector DB + embeddings — ~₹2,000–₹8,000/month depending on doc size and provider
- 3Logging, observability & hosting — ~₹2,000–₹6,000/month
- 4Human review — a few hours of someone spot-checking answers; a time cost, not a tooling one
So the recurring software bill lands in the low tens of thousands of rupees a month — not the lakhs people fear. The lakhs show up only when one of the leaks below is left unfixed.
Where the money actually leaks
- Using the frontier model for everything — the single most common and most expensive mistake.
- Stuffing the whole knowledge base into every prompt instead of retrieving only what's relevant — you pay for those tokens on every single call.
- No caching — re-answering identical or near-identical questions from scratch, every time.
- Runaway agents — loops with no step or budget cap that quietly rack up hundreds of calls.
- No per-user or per-endpoint limits — one abusive user or one viral moment turns a ₹20k bill into a ₹2L bill overnight.
- Chatty prompts and verbose outputs — paying for tokens that add no value.
How to cut AI costs without cutting quality
- 1Tier your models. Cheap model by default; escalate to the frontier only when the task genuinely needs it.
- 2Retrieve, don't stuff. Good RAG sends a few relevant chunks per call, not the whole corpus.
- 3Cache aggressively. Cache embeddings, frequent answers and repeated sub-steps.
- 4Cap everything. Max tokens per response, max steps per agent, budgets per user and per endpoint.
- 5Instrument from day one. You can't cut a cost you can't see — log tokens and spend per feature and per user.
- 6Shorten prompts and outputs. Trim system prompts, ask for concise responses, use structured outputs.
“Nobody is bankrupted by the price of a token. They're bankrupted by ten thousand tokens they never needed to send.”
The bottom line
AI is far cheaper to run in 2026 than the headlines suggest — if you build it deliberately. The base cost of intelligence keeps falling; the costs that hurt are self-inflicted: the frontier model doing a small model's job, prompts bloated with irrelevant context, agents with no brakes, and no visibility into any of it. Get the architecture right and a genuinely useful AI feature costs less than one junior salary a month to run.
We build AI features with the cost model baked in from day one — tiered models, real retrieval, caps and dashboards — and we regularly audit accounts that ballooned to find the leaks. If you want a straight estimate for your use case, or a second opinion on a bill that's climbing, send us the details and we'll take a look, free.